Hmh, is that what you really would like to eat? Was that a sacral response? If so, does it represent the right thing at the right time, in other words does it feel correct to turn it into action? Well, regardless of what you read in the menu and of how certain you feel about your decision, having someone asking you if that is what you really would like to eat can be of help to gain some clarity about your own decisional process.
Imagine now that there's no menu on the table. Of course, you need the waiter to inform you about what you can eat that day, till you suddenly witness yourself coming up with a "Uh - huh. Yes, I'll go for that!" Now, did you allow the waiter to go through the whole list or did you interrupt him before getting to the end? And, above all, did you need the waiter to finish his list before being clear on your order?
The sacral response expresses what your body responds to in the now and that response might have nothing to do with what you expected to order. As an example, let's suppose that your favorite dish is roast chicken with chips but, as soon as the waiter mentions it, there's no response from your sacral to it. After a while you hear the waiter saying hummus and, yes, that is what you're going to have for dinner. Is there any reason or explanation for that? No, none. Nevertheless, you took the risk to trust your body's intelligence and, by doing so, you challenged yourself to be honest with yourself no matter what.
And what if your authority is emotional? Of course, any preferences expressed before clarity is there might be regretted later. As always, time is your better ally. Beyond that, you might need the waiter to provide you with further information, before making your decision, especially if the first line, the line of investigation, is relevant in your chart.